Sunday, September 7, 2014

It's Not Our Fault - But It IS Our Problem

Reading One: Allan G. Johnson – “Privilege, Power, and Difference”

 “The truth of this powerful force is everywhere, but we don’t know how to talk about it, and so we act like it’s always somewhere other than here and now in the room with us” (7). It’s interesting that we, as a society, like to talk so much about ourselves while, at the same time, try to draw as much attention away from ourselves as possible. Johnson points out that we don’t like to talk about the issues of privilege and power because we don’t know how to do so; maybe the more frightening truth is that we do know how to do so, but are afraid of what might happen as a result of voicing these issues.

Strangely enough, just this morning, as I was flipping through this month’s Cosmo (another guilty pleasure), I came across this and stopped, a little baffled and a little unsure of how to feel:



Finally, we are talking about white, heterosexual, male power (and using those exact words!), but only to acknowledge that those unearned privileges are what allow white, heterosexual males to remain in power. I think what makes me most confused as to how to feel about this blurb is the word “eventually.” It seems so vague, so faraway, that it’s like a dream that just might come true if we wish for it hard enough. Instead of this (obvious) statement, why isn’t Cosmo telling us how to make that “eventually” come sooner? Who will? More importantly, if this is the kind of thing our students are reading, especially black/homosexual/female students, are they going to expect the cultural change to occur on its own? We need to bring up these issues that Johnson addresses to our students so that we may change society ourselves. Articles like this one from Cosmo take the responsibility away from us; meanwhile Johnson addresses the fact that we cannot be blamed for the problem, but the responsibility to fix it has fallen into our laps.

We need to stop ignoring what research and human experience have revealed “about human beings and how [we] live” (4). By looking at the harsh truths and sad realities of privilege and power and talking about them, perhaps then we might be able to understand them and, more importantly, understand how we can begin to change them.  Johnson disagrees with the “popular assumption that people are naturally afraid of what they don’t know or understand” by pointing out that we, as humans, are all “drawn toward the mystery of what [we] don’t know” (16). If we don’t know, then why are we afraid to make a change and see what might happen? The problem is that we think we know what is going to happen, and for that reason, people with power (as a result of an unearned privilege) think they stand to lose the most, regardless of how much people without power stand to gain.

People in positions of power are not willing to put themselves in a vulnerable position for someone else. What they (and we, as a society) need to be reminded of is that vulnerability is not always negative. Brene Brown, a research professor at the University of Houston, has spent over ten years studying vulnerability, courage, shame, and worthiness. We could all stand to gain something from putting ourselves on the line for others. Why can’t we focus more on what connects us and makes us alike, rather than disconnection and what makes us different? Let’s start talking about white, heterosexual, male power so that we can start changing.


It’s 2014, and we cannot afford to wait for someone else to fix our problems for us, our students, and the world that surrounds us. We are in positions of power as educators – let’s use this power to help others talk about, understand, and change the problems of privilege, power, and difference. 

4 comments:

  1. Tina, I agree. We have to be part of the solution. Just as you mentioned, I think people know the problem exist but they are not sure how to go about fixing or improving it. I liked how you said that Cosmo should be writing articles helping us fix these problems and move forward. I feel like in my studies we keep on identifying problems, we discuss problems in our society, but we never get to the point when we can work on eliminating or reducing these problems. I felt that Johnson's article did the same thing, discussed the problem, made clear examples, but now what do we do about it?
    ~Jenny

    ReplyDelete
  2. I love the serendipitous finding of that Cosmo article (even if it does only emphasize the eventual-ness of change)...the teacher brain is always on! Finding that blurb shows just how important it is to develop strong critical readers who can think further about whatever they are reading. As you said, it is great that the magazine is mentioning the influence of privilege in the workplace, but critical readers would know that it is not going far enough.

    Also, I really love your connection to Brene Brown's Ted Talk on vulnerability. Her ideas about personal courage and living through shame work so well with Johnson's ideas about naming the issues we face as a society and having those difficult conversations. Thanks for reminding me of this and making me think!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Having the conversation is important, changing the way people think is the objective, how do we measure progress? Data suggests that there is a definitive bias favoring the white, heterosexual, middle or upper-middle class male, and laws/popular culture/hiring practices indicate a trend to even the playing field. How do you measure what people think? If we say that a gay, asian, poor woman is in the most oppressed category in our society, who is deciding that she cannot have access to a meaningful education or be qualified for a high-paying job, or be happily married? If she is eligible for those privileges legally, than what is keeping her from having them? Is it the way people think? How can you measure/change that? Is the issue of privilege so clear cut? The more time I spend thinking about power and privilege, the more grey it seems. Where does ability, decision-making, and character fit in the equation? I am aware that privileged white males have been given advantages because of their place in the diversity wheel, and I am also aware that less-qualified applicants have risen to positions of power because they can check a diverse box off on an application. Can we measure the way people think, by requiring more white males get arrested, or less hispanics? Johnson cautions us to avoid using individual examples to counter-argue societal problems, and that as a privileged white male, any defensiveness I might feel proves the bias. I cannot know what it feels like to be anything other than what I am, but I can say that I value diversity because it is what makes life interesting, and feel that most of the people I know are like-minded. So maybe Cosmo has it right when it says "THINGS ARE CHANGING."

    ReplyDelete
  4. Your magazine's message drew me in. Although I have never picked up an issue I have to say that message is simple and nicely written. The title "You Aren't Weird... Your Situation is" says, to me, many women may think and feel this "weird" feeling (I am assuming undervalued and subordinate based on the context), but offers a sense of hope for others as our values and social constructed "situation" starts to evolve into a more cohesive society . Although I may be reading TOO into the heading, I think it offered a piece of mind for all women who read this and sends a positive and powerful message.

    Thank you for sharing this.

    ReplyDelete